Down Here With The Rest Of Us

Vox has a terribly fascinating article on the "smug style" in American politics. The more I read, the more it hurt, but I kept on reading because I knew this was a come-to-Jesus meeting liberals needed to have. I noticed a similarity between the sentiment at Vox and the sentiment in a recent article in a local newspaper:
They are poor and they are angry. Their future looks bleak, they feel cheated, and they couldn’t care less about Shakespeare or Franklin Roosevelt. In the America where business is king, they’re nothing but business in school, maximizing profit for minimal investment. They have learned from birth how best to survive in this Nightmare World of Bottom Lines Over All, with its harsh lessons I only wish I could have learned ten years earlier. I’ve stopped blaming them, and I’ve stopped feeling sorry for them. Now, I feel sorry for the rest of us.
The wild ride that has been the Bernie Sanders movement can work to help us adapt these feelings out of classrooms and into our daily lives in politics and society as a whole. We need to discuss this: generations of liberals come out of college and directly after are seeing themselves as anointed elites who are there to proclaim what Vox called the "Good Facts" to unwashed masses in a very Damien Sandow-like way. Although we may laugh at Mr. Sandow, it's a laugh that needs to come from knowing all too well that we used to, or still are, that guy... if gravely less muscularly defined.

Being in the Bernie movement, a movement that it seems will have a nigh-impossible struggle to achieve the nomination in July at Philadelphia, has given me a chance to see things from a new perspective. Let's face it: I'm a college-educated white rural cisgender man, so I have absolutely no idea what it's like to even be anything but top dog, if we're looking at the big picture. But, just like the rich kid who gets cut off from his inheritance and has to learn how to survive with the poors, my intellectual "inheritance" went poof as the economy crashed and the job market has yet to recover since 2007. Suddenly, respective to my own fairly privileged position, I was thrown from the relative comfort of middle-class to the relative drudgery of working-class. I pumped marine toilets, I toiled in commercial kitchens, and I spent months on the graveyard shift bagging bread at a local bakery, all the while seeing my bank accounts actually decrease because the low-wage money coming in wasn't enough to top the student loans going out. An entire generation got this rude awakening of what it's like to live, as Social Distortion so elegantly quipped, Down Here With The Rest Of Us.

All angst is relative, he quipped pedantically, and I've been able to use my time being slightly less well off than I used to be to understand much the same as being a substitute teacher and having paint thrown at me by unruly students caused me to understand their point of view. I never can, and never will understand how terrible life can be for some people in this country... but now I at least know that. And watching the Hillary supporters take a victory lap after my heart got crushed in California sent me looking for solace, instead I found Vox telling me I might have been the bad guy all along... and they're right.

Smugness won't work. Simply "knowing" your facts and figures and thinking that will go far enough to sway people to your anointed cause won't work. At the end of the day, we're all dirty, stupid, vapid, petty humans and that's what counts. Stay genuine, stay honest, and you'd be surprised how well the "smug liberal" ideas actually resonate with people outside of the liberal enclaves. Heck, don't take my word for it, look at Bernie cleaning house in places like North Dakota, or look at Robert Reich discovering new neighbors in the cause on his "Red State Tour"

We all hate the same stupid stuff. We have small differences, but in all reality it doesn't matter. I first started noticing this when I caught the last lines of a terrific documentary called Best of Enemies:
The ability to talk the same language is gone. More and more we're divided into communities of concern. Each side can ignore the other side and live in its own world. It makes us less of a nation because what binds us together is the pictures in our heads. But those people are not sharing those ideas. They're not living in the same place.
What has happened, I think, is that things have finally gotten so bad that we do share the same concerns now, because the concerns are so big. Good roads. Good schools. Safe food. Clean air & water. Healthcare. A government that represents us and not the donors. Free and fair elections. An end to pointless war. The list goes on, but my main takeaway is this: we always have to be questioning what we think are the Good Facts, and we should never discount someone completely out of hand. Most of us on the left discounted the email investigation as just another Republican witch hunt, and now there's a looming possible indictment of a major political figure. As my father, an old farmer and anything but a liberal elitist would say, "even a blind sow finds an ear of corn sometimes," and we need to start paying attention when they do.

It's not left and right, democrats and republicans, liberals and conservatives anymore. It's those with all the money and the power versus the rest of us. Princeton proved it: money now influences politics, not public opinion. We're all Leona Helmsley's "little people" now, and just trying to put a finer point on which one of us is the tallest Munchkin isn't going to do us any good. Bernie and Trump have shown us that the majority of Americans have a similar frustration with "elites," and if the major parties discount that and continue to embrace the smugness, they're going to find out that there's a lot more down here with the rest of us than they ever thought.

In Solidarity,

Doremus Jessup

Incremental History

I have heard ad nauseam these past months that big, bold change is foolish, unattainable, even dangerous. Now, if we put aside the multiple Historical examples where it happened (the ending of American slavery, the Trustbusting of the Progressive Era, the New Deal) or the awful catastrophes we had to wait patiently for in order to enact them (Civil War, Labor unrest, the Great Depression) and if we look proactively at the situation through the wide eye of History, there is a case to be made that we have been progressing very incrementally since the 1960s.
We’ve made strides here and there: Civil Rights, Environmental Protection, Health Care Reform, Equal Rights by gender, orientation, identification… each of these are little incremental pieces moving forward. For those who say some candidates are promising too much, too fast, there are millions of Americans saying the last few decades have done too little, and too slowly. Some of the ideas being thrown around in the Democratic Primary are not considered radical anywhere else in the developed world, and are not bold leaps forward but merely the steps that are necessary to take for this country to survive as a functioning Republic. You say you want incrementalism, I say it’s already here, and I am not alone. In the words of a famous Minnesotan:
“My friends, to those who say that we are rushing this issue of civil rights, I say to them we are 172 years late. To those who say that this civil-rights program is an infringement on states’ rights, I say this: The time has arrived in America for the Democratic Party to get out of the shadow of states’ rights and to walk forthrightly into the bright sunshine of human rights.“
Hubert H. Humphrey campaigned for human rights.
Healthcare is a human right.
Education is a human right.
Social mobility is a human right.
A living wage is a human right.
Opportunity is a human right.
Prosperity is a human right.
Free and fair elections are a human right.
To those who say we are rushing these issues, I say we are 68 years too late.

At Your Service,
Doremus Jessup.

Trickle-Down Taxation

Reaganism dictates that taxes are the enemy: any tax, anywhere, anyhow. In 2010, while most other states were going disturbingly red and setting themselves up for disaster, Minnesota did something curious: they elected a DFL governor specifically on the policy of raising taxes. Curiously, this did NOT lead to a statewide collapse, as the followers of Reaganism claimed for decades, but instead lead to Minnesota being a shining beacon of progress and prosperity in the middle of other Midwestern Republican-led states falling into ruin.
And yet, the Big Lie of Evil Taxes goes on. Cutting taxes, the Republicans claim, will allow those at the top to have more money to invest, and in investing there will be more supply, which will lead to more business, which will lead to more jobs, which will lead to more money. This, in essence, is the "Trickle Down" theory of economics.
Now, anyone with five minutes of economic study can tell you that increasing the supply while most people don't have enough money to demand or even afford new products is ridiculous, stupid, and backwards, but let's not assume the Republicans have any actual experience with how economics works in reality. Indeed, if Paul Ryan and his magic asterisks are the best they have, it seems rude to kick them when they're down.
So, we know Trickle Down Economics doesn't work because... well, reality exists, I suppose. But something does end up trickling down when those at the Federal and State level drool over the idea of cutting taxes here, there, everywhere, in a box, with a fox, and so on like some sort of demented Dr. Seuss character. It's not the prosperity that trickles down, however... it's the taxes.
We live in a social society. Certain social services and items are provided for us through public works, mainly because they are too big or too complex to make money for a private firm. We have public schools, public roads, public parks, and so on... and all of them are paid by taxes. So, when DC and St. Paul decide to cut taxes to save their own political skin, the towns and counties and townships have to pick up the slack. Suddenly, your local school tax goes up. The price to fix your roads or your bridges goes up. The price of having clean water goes up and, as we've seen in Flint, Michigan, it leads to shortcuts that damage lives. All the while, the rich and powerful sit in their cushy estates or in one of their many, many houses and count the cash they saved in tax breaks, while you and your neighbors struggle to get by with even half of what you had ten years ago.
The answer is simple: when someone like Greg Davids or Jeremy Miller bloviates about cutting taxes, saying it will be good for all, ask them if they're going to cut your local taxes, too, or if instead the benefits of tax cuts are only for the wealthiest Minnesotans. Governor Dayton and the DFL have proven that if you tax the rich, we all do better, so this November you need to bring the DFL back to a position where they can make sure we all do better, even if it means one less townhouse for a billionaire.
"And still Doremus goes on in the red sunrise, for a Doremus Jessup can never die."

Jon Pieper on Senator Miller Snub of Winona State


Sen. Miller was the deciding vote against a bill that would have invested over $25
million in a need for Winona State University, its students, and the City of Winona. The
bill was defeated by only one vote.

Once again, Republican Sen. Jeremy Miller has turned his back on the students in his
community and the people of Winona. Today, he joined every Republican Senator but
one in voting against the Senate bonding bill, a bill which would create 39,000 jobs
across the state and invest over $25 million in Winona State University’s Education
Village.

This is a shocking decision by our state senator and shows that he’d rather play
politics than lead.


The Education Village project is essential to Winona and WSU. Approximately 20% of
the student body is education majors who are committed to being the next generation of
teachers and educators that our state needs. They deserve a state of the art educational
experience and deserve support from their elected leadership.

 As minority lead on the Higher Education and Workforce Development Committee,
Jeremy Miller has once again proven that he’d rather follow his party than the people that
elected him.

I am incredibly disappointed in Sen. Miller’s actions today and believe we need new
leadership for our community in St. Paul. I’ve been disappointed by the number of votes
and days Sen. Miller has missed in the past four years, which means our district has not
had a voice when decisions are being made. As your state senator, I would be a
tireless advocate for our students, our communities, and other priorities facing
Southeastern Minnesota.

 We can and must do better than Sen. Jeremy Miller.

DFL-USA

We have seen the lessons of History. We know what happens when unchecked corruption poisons our government and our business. We know what needs to be done to save America for the average Americans, and for the aspiring Americans. We know what worked in the past to make America the envy of the world, the gold standard of prosperity, with small towns and big cities alike thrumming to the tune of progress for all. If we truly wanted to make America great, we need only to look to the past failures and successes of the American experiment to know in which way to move forward. Though it may be cut in our schools and derided in our culture, we must look back to History.

In the years following the Civil War, Americans kept taxes low and government weak. The result was a series of horrible economic shocks, one after the other: 1873, 1893, 1896, 1907, and even more. Banking panics, recessions, and stock market crashes, all running parallel with the likes of Rockefeller, Carnegie, Morgan, etc. More and more money going to the top, less money and jobs and less opportunity for those in the middle, quickly squeezed in with those on the bottom. And then, finally, the dam breaks entirely when the few left in the middle class borrow everything to afford the life they are told they need to have, and the global economy crashes in 1929. Only four years earlier, the President claims "the chief business of the American people is business," and unbridled business not only crashes the economy, but makes desperate and angry people the world over put strongmen and fascists into power, leading to World War II.

In the years following World War II, taxes were sky-high on the richest Americans, regulation of businesses and banks was strong, and wages were high. The government, knowing they had to keep the engine of America going when it stopped needing tanks and bombs to fight the fascists. As a result, government took the money from the rich and spent it to improve life for all: social spending for things like the Polio vaccine, the Man on the Moon, and the Interstate System provided jobs, money, health, and pride for all Americans. You could have almost called it Democratic Socialism.

Minnesota's caucus results prove that Minnesota often knows what is best for America before the majority of other states: we saw the damage a modern Republican government can wreak with Pawlenty, and when every other state went red in 2010, Minnesota went blue and enjoyed a prosperity only dreamed of by its Republican neighbors. Wisconsin, Kansas, Louisiana, and more including New Jersey and Iowa have felt the damage caused to an economy ruled by corporatists masquerading as "conservatives." Minnesota, the star of the north, stands as a beacon lighting the way to a better tomorrow, because it understands what happened yesterday.

History is on our side, facts are on our side, and the people are on our side: the DFL platform is a winning platform that has been proven to win in Minnesota and can be proven to win in America at large. Walter Mondale, a DFLer defined, was sold out by a political process that placed more weight on soundbites than the truth, and the past 30 years have proved that Mondale in 84 was right then, and he is still right now. If we do not take every chance to seize upon our successes and make it known to the greater country, we could very well be condemning our larger, united body to hard times coming again once more. Do not let 2016 become another repeat of 1877, or 1932, or even 2007. Get the message out that a progressive movement, a nationwide DFL movement, is what is needed to beat back the tide of anger, frustration, and ultimately crisis.